Language Log -- a useful site I really enjoy -- recently . But that's not why I'm noting it here. Instead, there's the reason why they're talking about it again.
In 2010 The Econonomist hosted a big debate on Language and Thought. It used a very spiffy web-enabled platform to host the debate, and a language academic thought it would make a dandy introduction to some readings she is poutting together on the topic. Alas ...
[T]he Economist's intro page on this debate leads only to an debate archive site that doesn't include this one; and the links in old LLOG posts are now redirected to the same unhelpful location.
A source at the magazine explained:
We vastly over-designed the debate platform (and over-thought it generally, in various ways), and when we stopped running the debates that way, we stopped running that bit of the website. The old debates are now unavailable online.
Fortunately for all concerned Language Log was able to find copies in the Internet Archive.
But if it hadn't ...
@jeremycherfas You can understand it from small organisations that maybe don't have many resources but not from a publication like The Economist which you would expect would want to keep the debates archived even if the original platform was no longer active.
colinwalker, Jul 22 2017 on micro.blog