Skip to main content

Jeremy Cherfas

Prepping for an imminent interview by reading https://newfoodeconomy.org/npis-birds-per-minute/ from @newfoodeconomy.

Jeremy Cherfas

How to discourage enterprise in the English countryside

1 min read

I have only seen one side of Nick Snelgar's dispute with his local planning authority but I have no reason to doubt what I've seen there. To me it seems indisputable that, no matter what politicians like Michael Gove may say, there is no real desire to allow small farmers to reform the farming and food landscape in England.

Jeremy Cherfas

What's the problem?

1 min read

Over at Scripting News, Dave Winer says:

Every blog should have a Subscribe button. In an open ecosystem this is a problem, a problem that silos don't have. Which is the advantage Twitter (a silo) has over the open web.

I guess I'm not smart enough to see what that problem might be.

Jeremy Cherfas

Diving into diacetyl for this week's Eat This Newsletter. You still have time to subscribe. https://www.eatthispodcast.com/form-view/1

Jeremy Cherfas

That’s a bit of a disappointment. Daily Kos won’t play nicely with Instapaper.

Jeremy Cherfas

Old posts open old wounds

1 min read

Some of the people rediscovering independent publishing on their own domains are agonising over self-censorship, guilt and the like. I'm slowly continuing to bring old posts over into my main site. That goes for the ones that hurt a bit to read.

The only ones I'm not bringing are link posts that include dead links. A few are just too topical to bother with. The others are coming over, albeit not very quickly, even if I have to go searching for archived pages to link to.

 

Jeremy Cherfas

Felix Salmon approves of Oxfam's latest inequality report

1 min read

Along the way, Salmon has this to say:

the world’s billionaires – the richest 2,000 people on the planet – saw their wealth increase by a staggering $762 billion in just one year. That’s an average of $381 million apiece. If those billionaires had simply been content with staying at their 2016 wealth, and had given their one-year gains to the world’s poorest people instead, then extreme poverty would have been eradicated. Hell, they could have eradicated extreme poverty, at least in theory, by giving up just one seventh of their annual gains.

Hang on a minute. Wouldn't the billionnaires need to make that awesome sacrifice every year? Or does the fact the people would slide back into extreme poverty next year not matter?

 

Jeremy Cherfas

This may seem strange, but I really don’t mind it when my social streams fall off the bottom because I’ve been away. Generally, I will catch up with anything that I find interesting, and if I don’t, that’s ok too.

Jeremy Cherfas

2018-01-23 02

1 min read

Catching up on reviewing my Christmas reading: Unbelievably dystopian

Jeremy Cherfas

2018-01-23

1 min read

Latest episode of Eat This Podcast is up now. Bread as it ought to be.